Umpiring Blunders Cast Shadow Over West Indies-Australia Test: Contentious DRS Calls Spark Outrage

Friday - 27/06/2025 00:08
The first Test between West Indies and Australia is marred by controversial third-umpire decisions. Several contentious calls by third umpire Adrian Holdstock have significantly impacted both teams, leading to widespread debate.

Third Umpire Decisions Under Scrutiny in West Indies vs. Australia Test

Bridgetown, Barbados - The first Test between the West Indies and Australia at Kensington Oval has been marred by a series of contentious decisions by third umpire Adrian Holdstock. Over two days, three calls have ignited debate and significantly impacted the flow of the match.

Contentious DRS calls plague WI vs AUS Test

After Australia were dismissed for 180 in their first innings, the West Indies responded with 190, gaining a slight advantage. However, Australia are fighting back, reaching 92/4 in their second innings by Day 2, holding a slender lead of 82 runs. The umpiring controversies have added a layer of tension to an already tightly contested match, impacting both teams. Travis Head and Beau Webster are currently at the crease for Australia.

The first controversial decision occurred on Day 1 when Travis Head was given not out, despite replays suggesting the ball was caught cleanly by the wicketkeeper off Shamar Joseph’s bowling. The third umpire determined there was insufficient evidence to overturn the on-field decision.

Another questionable moment followed on Day 2, when Roston Chase survived an LBW appeal off Josh Hazlewood. Although replays showed a clear spike on UltraEdge before the ball made contact, the third umpire sided with Chase, giving him the benefit of the doubt.

Chase went on to make 44 before being dismissed LBW to Pat Cummins, a decision that also raised eyebrows. Despite Chase's review citing a visible deviation near the bat, the original decision was upheld.

"I disagree with the decision, I disagree with the technology, I thought he hit that but somehow, it's worked against Roston Chase," former West Indies commentator Ian Bishop remarked during the broadcast.

Bishop further added, "I feel sorry for the officiating team there, in my view that should clearly have been not out. I apologise to the officials, but I'm in total disagreement, as he [Chase] is in bewilderment. You see a deflection, a change of direction of the ball as it approaches the bat. If you've watched the game for long enough, you can see it. If you're new to the game, maybe you don't notice it."

The DRS controversy did not end there. Shai Hope was given out caught behind to Alex Carey, even though replays appeared to indicate the ball may have touched the ground during the catch.

Australia now face a crucial task on Day 3 to build a substantial partnership and regain control of the Test match after some questionable umpiring decisions.

Total notes of this article: 0 in 0 rating

Click on stars to rate this article

Newer articles

Older articles

You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second